Court list · FED
Federal courts courts
Wednesday, December 16, 2026
32 entries from 9 courts. Entries are ordered as published: by court, then room, then name.
Federal Court of Appeal, Toronto · 1
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| BARBARA BLAIR v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA | — | Appeal | A-305-25 |
Federal Court, Edmonton · 1
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOSH MOHAMED HOSH v. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-2834-25 |
Federal Court, Montréal · 3
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estiven CASTILLO COLORADO v. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-3545-25 |
| MORENO DE MARCHI c. PGC | — | Judicial Review | T-2537-25 |
| SEYNABOU SENE c. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-10736-25 |
Federal Court, Ottawa · 3
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Davis v. Attorney General of Canada | — | Judicial Review | T-581-26 |
| The Administrator of the SOPF v. OWNERS OF THE TRAILER PRINCESS et Al. | — | Case Management Conference | T-436-25 |
| Verifi LLC v. Giatec Scientific Inc. | — | Motion | T-3901-25 |
Federal Court, Toronto · 11
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adama Issa Moussa v. MINISTRE DE LA CITOYENNETE ET DE L'IMMIGRATION CANADA | — | Judicial Review | IMM-16039-25 |
| Athavan Karunakaran v. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-11769-25 |
| INDERJIT KAUR v. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-11398-25 |
| Ilyas Hussain SYED v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRA | — | Judicial Review | IMM-25265-25 |
| Jennifer Jimenez v. Canada Revenue Agency | — | Judicial Review | T-899-26 |
| MARIA OMAR ABDISALAM v. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-6303-25 |
| MOHAMMAD MAJD MAHER HOMSI ET AL v. MCI ET AL | — | Judicial Review | IMM-775-17 |
| NIKUL JERAMBHAI NAVADIYA v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION | — | Judicial Review | IMM-15352-25 |
| SEYEDMASOUD TABATABAEIPOUR v. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-19988-24 |
| THE CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES ET AL v. MIRC ET AL | — | Judicial Review | IMM-2977-17 |
| THI CAM HUYNH v. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-15335-25 |
Tax Court of Canada, Montr al · 2
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9125-8327 Québec Inc. v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (General procedure) | 2025-560(IT)G |
| Gurdashan Singh Malhotra v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — GST ( Part IX of the Excise Tax ) — (Informal procedure) | 2025-115(GST)I |
Tax Court of Canada, Oakville · 1
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| John Mitchell v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — GST ( Part IX of the Excise Tax ) — (General procedure) | 2025-475(GST)G |
Tax Court of Canada, Toronto · 7
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Sepejak v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (Informal procedure) | 2025-609(IT)I |
| Elena Voronejskaia v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (Informal procedure) | 2023-36(IT)I |
| Gregory Tyler Peacock v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (General procedure) | 2022-1123(IT)G |
| Kyra Zaidenberg v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — GST ( Part IX of the Excise Tax ) — (General procedure) | 2023-2284(GST)G |
| Leeann Mariano v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (Informal procedure) | 2025-634(IT)I |
| Mehul Jain v. His Majesty the King | — | Application — GST ( Part IX of the Excise Tax ) | 2026-1361(GST)APP |
| Sygma Project Management Inc. v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (Informal procedure) | 2024-1189(IT)I |
Tax Court of Canada, Winnipeg · 3
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Vinesh v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (Informal procedure) | 2026-1145(IT)I |
| Sound Art Calgary Inc. v. His Majesty the King | — | Application — Income Tax | 2025-1911(IT)APP |
| Stewart Garnett v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (Informal procedure) | 2026-92(IT)I |
Notice. A listing shows only that a matter was scheduled before a court on this date. It does not mean anyone named was charged with, found guilty of, or found liable for anything. Lists change during the day; the court's own list is authoritative.