Court list · FED
Federal courts courts
Thursday, November 12, 2026
47 entries from 13 courts. Entries are ordered as published: by court, then room, then name.
Federal Court of Appeal, Ottawa · 2
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIS MAJESTY THE KING v. INGREDION CORPORATION CANADA | — | Appeal | A-39-26 |
| INGREDION CANADA CORPORATION v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA | — | Appeal | A-437-25 |
Federal Court, Edmonton · 1
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| KEHEWIN CREE FIRST NATION v. HIS MAJESTY THE KING IN RIGHT OF CANADA | — | Case Management Conference | T-320-18 |
Federal Court, Halifax · 1
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| N. P. P. v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration | — | Motion | IMM-1142-26 |
Federal Court, Montréal · 2
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARUMUGAM SRISKANDARAJAH v. CRA | — | Judicial Review | T-3267-24 |
| ARUMUGAM SRISKANDARAJAH v. CRA | — | Judicial Review | T-2169-26 |
Federal Court, Ottawa · 3
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGC v. IAIN HUNT et Al. | — | Hearing | DES-2-26 |
| RICHARD GARDNER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA | — | Judicial Review | T-5028-25 |
| WALIYI OKEOWO MUYIDEEN v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION | — | Judicial Review | IMM-12070-25 |
Federal Court, Toronto · 10
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADELIA YOLANDA v. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-11879-25 |
| CAIHONG CHEN v. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-22327-24 |
| CHANGJIAN WANG ET AL. v. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-17281-24 |
| DAMOLA WASIU LAWAL v. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-11095-24 |
| Ejike Destiny Wilson v. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-4376-25 |
| JANSSEN INC ET AL. v. JAMP PHARMA CORPORATION ET AL. | — | Case Management Conference | T-3163-26 |
| JEYAKUMAR ROKSAN JORDAL BERNAD v. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-8750-25 |
| LUCILA VELAZQUEZ FLORES v. MCI | — | Judicial Review | IMM-9927-25 |
| MOHAMMAD MAJD MAHER HOMSI ET AL v. MCI ET AL | — | Judicial Review | IMM-775-17 |
| THE CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES ET AL v. MIRC ET AL | — | Judicial Review | IMM-2977-17 |
Federal Court, Vancouver · 3
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| WE GROW B.C. LTD. v. ROYALMAX BIOTECHNOLOGY CANADA INC. et Al. | — | Judicial Review | T-1644-26 |
| ZHAOHUI TAO et Al. v. MIRC | — | Judicial Review | IMM-612-25 |
| ZHAOHUI TAO v. MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION, REFUGEES AND CITIZENSHIP | — | Judicial Review | IMM-20222-25 |
Supreme Court of Canada, Ottawa · 1
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian National Railway Company v. Alberta Pacific Forest Industries Inc. | — | Appeal hearing (from Federal) — Sealing order | 42092 |
Tax Court of Canada, Montr al · 3
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9287-6572 Québec Inc. v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (General procedure) | 2020-529(IT)G |
| Alain Paquette v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (General procedure) | 2018-4462(IT)G |
| Alain Paquette v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (General procedure) | 2018-4463(IT)G |
Tax Court of Canada, Nanaimo · 1
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Madjid Afghan v. His Majesty the King | — | Status Hearing — Income Tax — (General procedure) | 2022-2549(IT)G |
Tax Court of Canada, Ottawa · 1
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omer Leblanc v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — GST ( Part IX of the Excise Tax ) — (Informal procedure) | 2021-1575(GST)I |
Tax Court of Canada, Toronto · 15
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1126039 Ontario Inc. v. His Majesty the King | — | Show Cause Hearing — Income Tax — (General procedure) | 2023-2539(IT)G |
| 1503329 Ontario Ltd. v. His Majesty the King | — | Continuation of Appeal — GST ( Part IX of the Excise Tax ) — (General procedure) | 2021-3081(GST)G |
| Charlene Wexler v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (Informal procedure) | 2025-1312(IT)I |
| Craig Warren v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (Informal procedure) | 2024-2442(IT)I |
| Craig Warren v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (Informal procedure) | 2025-2578(IT)I |
| Feng Shen v. His Majesty the King | — | Show Cause Hearing — Income Tax — (General procedure) | 2024-5(IT)G |
| Feng Shen v. His Majesty the King | — | Show Cause Hearing — Income Tax — (General procedure) | 2024-839(IT)G |
| Gopi Rajendran v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — GST ( Part IX of the Excise Tax ) — (Informal procedure) | 2025-607(GST)I |
| Janet Hercz v. His Majesty the King | — | Continuation of Appeal — Income Tax — (Informal procedure) | 2025-1031(IT)I |
| Lloyd Wilks v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (Informal procedure) | 2019-460(IT)I |
| Pashalis Hatzitrifonos v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (Informal procedure) | 2024-1431(IT)I |
| RisQ Consulting Inc. v. His Majesty the King | — | Application — Income Tax | 2026-795(IT)APP |
| Ronald Le Stage v. His Majesty the King | — | Continuation of Appeal — Income Tax — (General procedure) | 2016-4830(IT)G |
| Ronald Le Stage v. His Majesty the King | — | Continuation of Appeal — Income Tax — (General procedure) | 2023-883(IT)G |
| Ronald Le Stage v. His Majesty the King | — | Continuation of Appeal — Income Tax — (General procedure) | 2024-714(IT)G |
Tax Court of Canada, Victoria · 4
| Name | Room | Listing type | Case no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dougann Pirie v. His Majesty the King | — | Show Cause Hearing — Income Tax — (General procedure) | 2022-2680(IT)G |
| Gandhi Holdings Ltd. v. His Majesty the King | — | Show Cause Hearing — GST ( Part IX of the Excise Tax ) — (General procedure) | 2024-21(GST)G |
| Kosmosh Transport v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (Informal procedure) | 2026-83(IT)I |
| Thelma Fayle v. His Majesty the King | — | Appeal — Income Tax — (Informal procedure) | 2025-1671(IT)I |
Notice. A listing shows only that a matter was scheduled before a court on this date. It does not mean anyone named was charged with, found guilty of, or found liable for anything. Lists change during the day; the court's own list is authoritative.